United States v. Anthony Waits

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Anthony Waits

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 19-3382 ___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Anthony Leon Waits,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________

Submitted: November 24, 2020 Filed: December 8, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Anthony Waits appeals after the district court1 entered an amended order of forfeiture, following this court’s affirmance of his wire fraud conviction and remand of the forfeiture issue for further proceedings.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err by ordering forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). Although the indictment cited only 18 U.S.C. § 982, Waits had adequate notice that the government intended to seek forfeiture. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a); United States v. Silvious, 512 F.3d 364, 370 (7th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and deny Waits’s pending motion as moot. ______________________________

1 The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished