United States v. Joshua Walker
United States v. Joshua Walker
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 20-1490 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Joshua Walker
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________
Submitted: December 09, 2020 Filed: December 14, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Joshua Walker appeals after he pleaded guilty, under a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver, to conspiring to transport stolen vehicles and felon-in-possession charges, and the district court1 imposed a within-Guidelines sentence. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as an abuse of discretion and as substantively unreasonable.
We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case because Walker entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, his arguments fall within the scope of the appeal waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers). Further, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal based on the appeal waiver, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished