Corey Fisherman v. Jared McGriff
Corey Fisherman v. Jared McGriff
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 20-1671 ___________________________
Corey E. Fisherman
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Jared McGriff, also known as Jered McGreiff; Bradley Dupre, M.D.; Kristin Jacobs; Vicki Dean-Gramlich; Jack Serier
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Kristin, RN Pro M-H
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: December 21, 2020 Filed: December 28, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Corey Fisherman appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no basis for reversal. See Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); Carter v. Arkansas, 392 F.3d 965, 968 (8th Cir. 2004) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Elizabeth Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished