Minor McNeil v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Minor McNeil v. United States

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 20-2638 ___________________________

Minor Lee McNeil

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

United States of America; Department of Treasury

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________

Submitted: February 19, 2021 Filed: March 2, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Minor McNeil appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint regarding the issuance of a summons to determine his federal income tax liability and the

1 The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. garnishing of his wages to pay past-due taxes. He argues that federal taxation of his wages is unconstitutional and he is a citizen of a “sovereign” state.

The district court determined that McNeil had not identified any applicable waiver of sovereign immunity or any basis for the court’s jurisdiction over his claims. After careful review, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hastings v. Wilson, 516 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review).

As to the government’s motion for sanctions, we may award “just damages” and single or double costs if we determine that an appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1912; Fed. R. App. P. 38. In this case, we conclude that sanctions are appropriate. See United States v. Gerads, 999 F.2d 1255, 1256-57 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (rejecting argument that “Free Citizens of the Republic of Minnesota” were not subject to taxation; granting government’s motion for sanctions for frivolous appeal).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we grant the government’s motion for sanctions in the amount of $8,000. We also deny McNeil’s motion for remand. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished