Christopher Ivey v. Daniel Williams
Christopher Ivey v. Daniel Williams
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 20-2405 ___________________________
Christopher Ivey
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Daniel Williams; Michael Glavan; William Gullickson; Scott Giannini; Tara Halverson; Kevin Dreher; Matthew Dahl
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: May 19, 2021 Filed: May 24, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Christopher Ivey appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. John Deere & Co., 829 F.3d 661, 665 (8th Cir. 2016) (stating that the grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant and giving him the benefit of all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the record). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Tony N. Leung, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished