United States v. Michael Cason
United States v. Michael Cason
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 20-2476 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Michael Barrett Cason, also known as Daddy
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________
Submitted: July 6, 2021 Filed: July 12, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Cason appeals after he pleaded guilty to a sex offense and the district 1 court sentenced him pursuant to a binding plea agreement. His counsel has moved
1 The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), relaying that Cason contends the district court lacked jurisdiction over him because of his sovereign citizen status.
After careful review, we conclude that Cason’s argument fails because the district court had jurisdiction over violations of federal law. See 18 U.S.C. § 3231 (stating that district courts have original jurisdiction, exclusive of state courts, of all offenses against the laws of the United States); United States v. Hayes, 574 F.3d 460, 471-72 (8th Cir. 2009) (stating that because the indictment sufficiently alleged a violation of the laws of the United States, the district court had jurisdiction). Furthermore, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished