Stacy Arnold v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Stacy Arnold v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 21-1261 ___________________________

Stacy K. Arnold

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

City of St. Joseph, Missouri; St. Joseph Public Library; Officer Rebecca Hailey, In her personal and professional capacity

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph ____________

Submitted: September 14, 2021 Filed: September 17, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________

Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Stacy Arnold appeals after the district court1 dismissed some of her claims and adversely granted summary judgment as to her

1 The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. remaining claims. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court properly determined Arnold lacked standing as to her claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, see Buckler v. United States, 919 F.3d 1038, 1044 (8th Cir. 2019) (reviewing de novo grant of motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)); City of Kennett v. EPA, 887 F.3d 424, 430 (8th Cir. 2018) (reviewing de novo standing determination on summary judgment); and properly granted summary judgment as to her claims for damages, see McReynolds v. Schmidli, 4 F.4th 648, 652 (8th Cir. 2021) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished