United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 20-3402 ___________________________

Jack R. T. Jordan

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

U.S. Department of Labor

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

Dyncorp International, L.L.C.

lllllllllllllllllllllInterested party - Intervenor ___________________________

No. 20-3404 ___________________________

Jack R. T. Jordan

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

U.S. Department of Labor

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

Dyncorp International, L.L.C.

lllllllllllllllllllllInterested party - Intervenor ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Labor (except OSHA) ____________

Submitted: November 2, 2021 Filed: November 5, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated cases, Jack Jordan petitions for review of final orders from the United States Department of Labor Administrative Review Board (ARB). After careful review, we conclude the ARB’s decisions were not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, contrary to the law, or unsupported by substantial evidence in the record. See 49 U.S.C. § 31105(d) (appellate court reviews ARB’s decision pursuant to Administrative Procedure Act); 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) (reviewing court shall hold unlawful and set aside agency decision found to be arbitrary, capricious, abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law, or if unsupported by substantial evidence in record). Accordingly, we deny Jordan’s petition in each case. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-