United States v. Carlos Pacheco
United States v. Carlos Pacheco
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 21-2446 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Carlos Pacheco
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville ____________
Submitted: November 12, 2021 Filed: November 22, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________
Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Carlos Pacheco appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to visa fraud and perjury. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a
1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Pacheco. See United States v. Brown, 992 F.3d 665, 673 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760–61 (8th Cir. 2014) (presuming reasonable sentences within United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual range ). Further, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished