United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 21-3334 ___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Darron Van Hill,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________

Submitted: February 10, 2022 Filed: February 28, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Darron Van Hill appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and imposed a term of imprisonment, followed by an additional term of supervised

1 The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. release. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the prison sentence as substantively unreasonable.

After reviewing the record under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, we conclude the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The district court sufficiently considered the relevant statutory sentencing factors and did not overlook a relevant factor, give significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commit a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); Miller, 557 F.3d at 917. The sentence is below the statutory limits, see § 3583(e)(3), and is presumptively reasonable because it is within the applicable policy statement range in the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual, see U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(a); United States v. Petreikis, 551 F.3d 822, 824-25 (8th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________

-2-