United States v. Anthony Birdine
United States v. Anthony Birdine
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1417 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Anthony Birdine lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: March 28, 2022 Filed: April 5, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________ Before KELLY, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Anthony Birdine seeks a sentence reduction under Amendments 706, 750, and to the Sentencing Guidelines. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court1 denied one, and we affirm.
In the course of addressing Birdine’s motion, the district court explained why it denied relief. See United States v. Burrell, 622 F.3d 961, 964 (8th Cir. 2010). And that explanation was sufficient for us to conclude that there was no abuse of discretion. See, e.g., United States v. Lewis, 827 F.3d 787, 790 (8th Cir. 2016). ______________________________
The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.