Franklin Nelson v. Jim Croymans

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Franklin Nelson v. Jim Croymans

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 21-3748 ___________________________

Franklin Sandoval Nelson

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Jim Croymans, Chief of Police, City of Sisseton in his official and individual capacities; City of Sisseton, a municipal corporation in the official and individual capacities; Kerry M. Cameron, Former Roberts State’s Attorney in the official and individual capacities; Tim Zempel, Roberts County Comm. in his official and individual capacities; Roberts County, in the official and individual capacities; Timothy J. Cummings, officer of the Court (Lawyer) in his official and individual capacities; Robin Weinkauf, a/k/a Anger, Skidmore (prosecutrix) in her official and individual capacities; Brent Fluke, Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison in his official and individual capacities; Darin Young, Warden, South Dakota State Prison in his official and individual capacities; Robert Dooley, Former Warden of MDSP in his official and individual capacities

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota ____________

Submitted: April 28, 2022 Filed: May 3, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

South Dakota resident Franklin Nelson appeals following the dismissal of his pro se civil rights action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we affirm the district court’s1 challenged rulings for the reasons stated in its orders. We also reject Nelson’s claim of judicial bias. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished