Samuel Zean v. SelectQuote Insurance Services
Samuel Zean v. SelectQuote Insurance Services
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-1263 ___________________________
Samuel Zean
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
eFinancial, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
SelectQuote Insurance Services, a Kansas Corporation
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
Burialexpense.com
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
InsideResponse, LLC, a Kansas Limited Liability Company; Tiburon Insurance Services, a California Company
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Allied Insurance Partners, a Florida Corporation, also known as Alliedco/Allied Insurance Services
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: May 31, 2022 Filed: June 3, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota resident Samuel Zean appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action raising claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished