United States v. Phillip King, III

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Phillip King, III

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-1403 ___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Phillip Harlan King, III

Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________

Submitted: May 31, 2022 Filed: June 6, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Harlan King, III appeals after he pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court dismisses the appeal based on the appeal waiver. King objects to the above-Guidelines sentence the district court1 imposed. Counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) in which he acknowledges the appeal waiver but challenges a 4-level Guidelines enhancement under U.S.S.G § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) and challenges the sentence as unreasonable. The appeal waiver is enforceable, as counsel’s arguments fall within the scope of the appeal waiver. The record shows that King entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into waiver and plea agreement, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice); see also 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2) (maximum prison sentence is 120 months).

This court has reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and has found no non-frivolous issues outside the scope of the appeal waiver.

The appeal is dismissed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________

1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished