United States v. Dyqwon Brown
United States v. Dyqwon Brown
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-1383 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Dyqwon D. Brown
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________
Submitted: June 28, 2022 Filed: July 1, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Dyqwon Brown received a 96-month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of ammunition. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). As part of the plea agreement, he waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence, except for, as relevant here, ineffective assistance of counsel. An Anders brief questions the enforceability of the plea agreement, the substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed by the district court,1 and counsel’s performance. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
The appeal waiver, which is enforceable, covers all but one of these issues. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the validity of an appeal waiver de novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). For that one, ineffective assistance of counsel, it is too early to consider it given the state of the record. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 824, 826–27 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that this type of claim is “usually best litigated in collateral proceedings”).
Finally, we have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel permission to withdraw. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Beth Phillips, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished