United States v. Eleanor Repper
United States v. Eleanor Repper
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-1606 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Eleanor Repper
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville ____________
Submitted: July 19, 2022 Filed: July 22, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Eleanor Repper appeals after the district court1 revoked her supervised release and sentenced her to a term of imprisonment within the advisory Sentencing
1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Guidelines range. Her counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
We conclude that the revocation sentence was not unreasonable, as there is no indication that the court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-24 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review); United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008) (revocation sentence within Guidelines range is accorded presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished