United States v. Jamil Steward
United States v. Jamil Steward
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 21-3775 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jamil Arthur Steward
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa ____________
Submitted: September 6, 2022 Filed: September 8, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Jamil Steward appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to drug and weapons offenses. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has
1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, then Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, now retired. filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Steward. See United States v. Brown, 992 F.3d 665, 673 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review); United States v. Moore, 581 F.3d 681, 684 (8th Cir. 2009) (stating where district court has sentenced defendant below advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual range, “it is nearly inconceivable” sentencing court abused its discretion by not varying downward further). Additionally, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished