United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-2695 ___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Ali Fazil Ali,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: October 24, 2022 Filed: October 27, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Ali Ali appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 6 months in prison. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed

1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the revocation sentence.

We conclude that Ali’s sentence was not unreasonable, as there was no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-23 (8th Cir. 2006); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014). The revocation sentence and term of supervised release are within the statutory range, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), and the district court stated that it had considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________

-2-