Kenneth Daywitt v. Jodi Harpstead
Kenneth Daywitt v. Jodi Harpstead
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-2484 ___________________________
Kenneth Daywitt; Kenneth Parks; Nicholas Luhmann; Joseph Thomas; Ramone Newell; Allen Pyron
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Jodi Harpstead, in their official and individual capacities; Nancy Johnston, in their official and individual capacities; Kathryn Schesso, in their official and individual capacities; Peter Puffer, in their official and individual capacities
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: November 14, 2022 Filed: November 17, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________
Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Minnesota civil detainees Kenneth Daywitt, Kenneth Parks, Nicholas Luhmann, Joseph Thomas, Ramone Newell, and Allen Pyron appeal the district court’s1 dismissal of their pro se complaint for failure to state a claim. After careful de novo review, see Levy v. Ohl, 477 F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished