Phillip Sterling, Jr. v. Travis Hill
Phillip Sterling, Jr. v. Travis Hill
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2089 ___________________________ Phillip Jay Sterling, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Sheriff Travis Hill, Pike County Arkansas lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs ____________ Submitted: December 2, 2022 Filed: December 7, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Phillip Sterling appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Morris v. Cradduck, 954 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2020) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.