United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 22-2839 ___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff Appellee

v.

Casey Fontaine Westerfield

Defendant Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________

Submitted: December 27, 2022 Filed: December 30, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Casey Westerfield appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a gun offense. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as substantively unreasonable.

Having reviewed the record under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard of review, see Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41, 51 (2007), we conclude the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. The court considered the statutory sentencing factors and did not overlook a relevant factor, give significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commit a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a); United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc); see also United States v. Dunn, 928 F.3d 688, 694 (8th Cir. 2019). We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________

-2-