United States v. Davantres Moore
United States v. Davantres Moore
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2861 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Davantres Deshaun Moore lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________ Submitted: February 1, 2023 Filed: February 6, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Davantres Moore appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (sentences are reviewed for substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse of discretion standard; abuse of discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors). The record establishes that the district court adequately considered the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (on appeal, within-Guidelines-range sentence may be presumed reasonable).
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.