United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2951 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Bradley Reid lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: April 11, 2023 Filed: April 14, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Bradley Reid appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pled guilty to drug and firearm offenses pursuant to a written plea agreement containing The Honorable Sarah E. Pitlyk, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and enforcing waiver would not result in miscarriage of justice).

We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________

-2-