United States v. Jason Woodring
United States v. Jason Woodring
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2734 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Jason Woodring lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________ Submitted: April 17, 2023 Filed: April 20, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Federal prisoner Jason Woodring appeals the district court’s 1 order granting the government’s motion for $1,000.87 from Woodring’s inmate trust account to be The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. applied to his restitution obligations. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
Contrary to Woodring’s contention on appeal, the district court properly considered evidence showing that he had received multiple stimulus payments, including a $1,200 economic impact payment in December 2020. This court declines to consider arguments that Woodring raises for the first time on appeal.
See Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc. v. Wall St. Equity Grp., Inc., 809 F.3d 1018, 1022 (8th Cir. 2016) (appellate court ordinarily does not consider argument raised for first time on appeal).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.