United States v. Richard Steele
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2684 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Richard Steele lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Western ____________ Submitted: May 12, 2023 Filed: June 29, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, Chief Judge, COLLOTON and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Richard Steele appeals after he pleaded guilty to assaulting and resisting a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1), (b). The district court1 sentenced him to 20 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Steele argues that his right to a speedy trial was violated.
“Upon careful review, we conclude that [Steele] waived any speedy trial claim by pleading guilty.” United States v. Lacey, No. 21-3737, 2022 WL 1594528, at *1 (8th Cir. May 20, 2022) (unpublished per curiam) (citing United States v. Cox, 985 F.2d 427, 433 (8th Cir. 1993) (claim that indictment should have been dismissed for violation of the Speedy Trial Act was waived by guilty plea); Speed v. United States, 518 F.2d 75, 77 (8th Cir. 1975) (“[I]t is well settled that a plea of guilty waives any claim to denial of a speedy trial”)).2 Accordingly, we affirm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.