United States v. Kori Hobbs
United States v. Kori Hobbs
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1387 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Kori Dawn Hobbs, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________ Submitted: July 20, 2023 Filed: August 2, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Kori Hobbs appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after Hobbs pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that Hobbs’s sentence was not substantively unreasonable. There is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc).
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.