United States v. Donna Jenkins
United States v. Donna Jenkins
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1621 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Donna Jenkins, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________ Submitted: July 19, 2023 Filed: August 2, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Donna Jenkins appeals a sentence imposed by the district court1 after Jenkins pleaded guilty to a drug offense. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the reasonableness of the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that Jenkins’s sentence was not unreasonable. There is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc).
We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.