Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak
Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2136 ___________________________ Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Veteran Affairs lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC; A.G. Merrick B. Garland; Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City ____________ Submitted: September 14, 2023 Filed: September 19, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Missouri resident Jay Ehrenfeld appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se employment discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Dalton v. NPC Int’l, Inc., 932 F.3d 693, 695 (8th Cir. 2019) (reviewing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) dismissals de novo); Said v. Mayo Clinic, 44 F.4th 1142, 1147 (8th Cir. 2022) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.