Richard Davis v. Gaylon Lay
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1258 ___________________________ Richard Alan Davis, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Gaylon Lay, Warden, EARU; Emmer Branch, Deputy Warden, EARU; James Dycus, Deputy Warden, EARU; Randy Shores, Major; Kenyon Randall, Major, EARU; Jeffery Deen, Field Major, EARU, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Delta ____________ Submitted: September 26, 2023 Filed: October 10, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Richard Davis appeals an order of the district court1 granting summary judgment in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following a careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.