United States v. Michael Hambrick
United States v. Michael Hambrick
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2152 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Michael Jermaine Hambrick Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________ Submitted: October 27, 2023 Filed: November 1, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM Michael Jermaine Hambrick pled guilty to an ammunition offense pursuant to a written plea agreement. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
Hambrick appeals the below-Guidelines-range sentence the district court 1 imposed. Counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. The district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence.
The court properly considered the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), as well as Hambrick’s policy arguments. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing substantive reasonableness under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard; district court abuses its discretion when it fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits a clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors); see also United States v. Sharkey, 895 F.3d 1077, 1082 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (concluding district court did not abuse its discretion where it considered and rejected argument based on policy disagreement with Guidelines). The court imposed a prison term below the Guidelines range. See United States v. McCauley, 715 F.3d 1119, 1127 (8th Cir. 2013) (holding it is “nearly inconceivable” district court abused its discretion in not varying further when it varied below Guidelines range).
This court has independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and finds no non-frivolous issues currently ripe for appeal.
The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________
The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.