Larry Muldrow v. State of Arkansas
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1813 ___________________________ Larry D. Muldrow lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v.
State of Arkansas; Hempstead County, Arkansas; Miller County, Arkansas; Nakesha Phoenix, HUD Official; Bancorp South/Cadence Bank; Social Security Administration; State Trooper Corwin Battle; Cyber Security, Acting in concert with all relevant times lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana ____________ Submitted: November 9, 2023 Filed: November 15, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________ PER CURIAM.
Larry D. Muldrow appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and denial of his post-judgment motions. Having carefully reviewed the record and Muldrow’s filings on appeal, we conclude that Muldrow failed to state a claim on which relief may be granted, and has presented no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (standard of review); Fed. R. App. P. 27(a)(2)(A).
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. All pending motions are denied.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.