United States v. Eric Rollins
United States v. Eric Rollins
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1900 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Eric Dean Rollins lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa ____________ Submitted: July 10, 2024 Filed: July 15, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before KELLY, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Eric Rollins appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to six months in prison and a life term of supervised release. His The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief challenging the revocation sentence as substantively unreasonable. Rollins filed a supplemental pro se brief arguing the sentence violates his First and Eighth Amendment rights.
After reviewing the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the sentence. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915- (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the substantive reasonableness of a revocation sentence under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard). We also reject Rollins’s challenges to the constitutionality of his sentence. See United States v. Contreras, 816 F.3d 502, 514 (8th Cir. 2016); United States v. Israel, 317 F.3d 768, 770 (7th Cir. 2003).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.