Ahmad Daniel v. Honeywell International Inc.
Ahmad Daniel v. Honeywell International Inc.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3476 ___________________________ Ahmad Daniel lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Honeywell International Inc.; Katie Lorentzen; Dawn C. Valdivia; Tara Hill; Kyle Swatfager lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: July 15, 2024 Filed: August 2, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before KELLY, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Ahmad Daniel appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se employment discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was warranted based on Daniel’s failure to comply with federal and local rules. See Mangan v. Weinberger, 848 F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir. 1988) (reviewing dismissal for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 for abuse of discretion); see also Nw. Bank & Tr. Co. v. First Ill. Nat’l Bank, 354 F.3d 721, 725 (8th Cir. 2003) (reviewing district court’s application of its local rules for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Daniel’s pending motion. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.