United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1539 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Dominique Glosson, also known as Dominique Glossonsmith lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield ____________ Submitted: September 16, 2024 Filed: September 19, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Dominique Glosson appeals after he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses pursuant to a plea agreement that includes an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence imposed by the district court.1 Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss the appeal. ______________________________

The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-