United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1194 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Justin James Monchamp lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: September 23, 2024 Filed: October 2, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Justin James Monchamp appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 12 months’ imprisonment. He challenges the substantive reasonableness of his revocation sentence.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a revocation sentence of 12 months’ imprisonment.

See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-17 (8th Cir. 2009). The revocation sentence is within the Guidelines range, and we afford it a presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal. See United States v. Weems, 76 F.4th 1153, 1156 (8th Cir. 2023). The district court did not overlook a relevant factor, give significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commit a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923–24 (8th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________

The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-