United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2983 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Philip Maccani, also known as Phillip Maccani, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________ Submitted: December 28, 2023 Filed: January 18, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Philip Maccani appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 9 months in prison and 2 years of supervised release. His The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the findings of certain violations and the reasonableness of the revocation sentence. In a pro se brief, Maccani challenges the violations.

Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding that Maccani violated his supervised release. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Maccani. The sentence was within the advisory guideline range. There is no indication the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See Miller, 557 F.3d at 915-16; United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006); see also United States v. Perkins, 526 F.3d 1107, 1110 (8th Cir. 2008). The revocation sentence was below the statutory maximum. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2), (e)(3), (h).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________

-2-