United States v. Jamerl Wortham
United States v. Jamerl Wortham
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2271 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jamerl M. Wortham Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: February 6, 2024 Filed: February 12, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Jamerl Wortham appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after the court vacated one count of conviction and resentenced him. His counsel has moved The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. to withdraw, and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 36 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in imposing the Guidelines sentence that Wortham received. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc); United States v. Bridges, 569 F.3d 374, 379 (8th Cir. 2009); United States v. Canania, 532 F.3d 764, 773 (8th Cir. 2008). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.