United States v. Jennifer Mares-Flores

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3538 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Jennifer Mares-Flores lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________ Submitted: March 18, 2024 Filed: March 28, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Jennifer Mares-Flores apppeals after the district court1 revoked her supervised release and sentenced her to 8 months in prison and 24 months of supervised release.

Her counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the revocation sentence.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Mares-Flores, as it properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors; there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors; and the sentence was within the advisory Guidelines range and below the statutory limit. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (maximum revocation prison term is 2 years for Class C felony); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (maximum supervised release term is life); United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence is reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard); see also United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004) (district court need not mechanically list every § 3553(a) factor when sentencing defendant upon revocation; all that is required is consideration of relevant matters and some reason for court’s decision).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm. ______________________________