Darrell Smith v. B. Eischen, Warden
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2620 ___________________________ Darrell Smith lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant v. B. Eischen, FPC Duluth, Warden lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: April 2, 2024 Filed: April 5, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Darrell Smith appeals the judgment of the district court1 dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, in which he challenged the calculation and application of his earned First Step Act time credits by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), and the BOP’s method of computing the percentage of Smith’s prison sentence served. Following our review of the record and the preserved claims for appeal, we conclude that the district court properly denied relief. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and Smith’s motions to supplement the record are denied as moot. ______________________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.