United States v. Cassandra Hapip
United States v. Cassandra Hapip
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3006 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Cassandra Hope Hapip Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota ____________ Submitted: March 11, 2024 Filed: May 9, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
In 2021, Cassandra Hope Hapip served time in prison after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. After serving her sentence, Hapip violated the terms of her supervised release. The district court 1 sentenced Hapip to twelve months of imprisonment to be followed by a two-year term of supervised release. Hapip appealed and argued the district court procedurally erred and imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence. During the pendency of her appeal, Hapip was released from prison. Because she only challenged her custodial sentence on appeal, there is no longer a case or controversy. See Owen v. United States, 930 F.3d 989, 990 (8th Cir. 2019) (“The mere fact that [a defendant] is serving an unexpired, unchallenged term of supervised release does not sustain an actual controversy.”). Thus, we dismiss the appeal as moot. ______________________________
The Honorable Daniel M. Traynor, United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota. -2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.