United States v. Craig Allen
United States v. Craig Allen
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1598 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Craig Allen lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: July 5, 2024 Filed: July 11, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Craig Allen appeals after the district court1 denied his motion seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). His counsel has filed a motion to The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the denial. Allen has also filed a pro se brief.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that a reduction was not warranted. See United States v. Boyd, 819 F.3d 1054, 1056 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (district court’s decision whether to grant authorized § 3582(c)(2) motion is reviewed for an abuse of discretion).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.