United States v. Blake Knievel
United States v. Blake Knievel
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-3357 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Blake M. Knievel
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________
Submitted: February 11, 2025 Filed: February 14, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Blake Knievel appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Upon careful review, we conclude that
1 The Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. the court did not err in finding that Knievel failed to establish extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting a sentence reduction. See United States v. Marcussen, 15 F.4th 855, 858 (8th Cir. 2021).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished