United States v. Blake Knievel
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-3357 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Blake M. Knievel lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: February 11, 2025 Filed: February 14, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Blake Knievel appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Upon careful review, we conclude that the court did not err in finding that Knievel failed to establish extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting a sentence reduction. See United States v. Marcussen, 15 F.4th 855, 858 (8th Cir. 2021).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.