Denicia Roberts v. Mark Berry
Denicia Roberts v. Mark Berry
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3231 ___________________________ Denicia V. Roberts lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Mark Berry, Major General, individually and in his official capacity as Former Adjutant General of the Arkansas Military Department; Mark McKinnon, Individually and in his official capacity as a Departmental Supervisor in and for the Arkansas Military Department; Arkansas Military Department; Scott Stanger, Individually, and in his official capacity as a Quality Assurance/Policy Maker for the Arkansas Military Department; Michelle Young-Hobbs, Individually, and in her official capacity as the Human Resource Administrator for the Arkansas Military Department lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________ Submitted: February 7, 2025 Filed: February 28, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Denicia Roberts appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Collins v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 92 F.4th 770, 771 (8th Cir. 2024) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.