Susan Ross v. Menaka Chandra
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 24-3099
___________________________
Susan Chanell Ross Plaintiff - Appellant v. Dr. Menaka Chandra Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: March 11, 2025 Filed: March 14, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before BENTON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________ PER CURIAM.
Susan Ross appeals following the district court’s 1 dismissal of her pro se complaint. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
After careful review, this court finds no basis for reversal. See Mo. Rev. Stat. § 538.225 (affidavit required in action against health care provider for damages on account of rendering or failure to render health care services; court shall dismiss action if plaintiff fails to file affidavit); Mathison v. United States, 44 Fed. Appx. 27, 29 (8th Cir. 2002) (unpublished per curiam) (failure to comply with affidavit requirement excusable only where defendant’s liability can be established without expert testimony; plaintiff’s claims of dental malpractice required expert affidavit).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.