United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-3178 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Scott Douglas Edwards lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 24-3179 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Scott Douglas Edwards lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeals from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________ Submitted: April 8, 2025 Filed: April 11, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated cases, Scott Edwards appeals the sentences the district court1 imposed after revoking his concurrent terms of supervised release. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentences.

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, as Edwards admitted to violating the conditions of his release, and the revocation sentences are within the statutory maximums. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 916 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the substantive reasonableness of a revocation sentence for an abuse of discretion); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (reciting the factors to discern whether a revocation sentence is unreasonable); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (the maximum revocation prison term is two years if the underlying offense is a Class C felony); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C) (setting a minimum--but no maximum--term of supervised release for certain controlled substance offenses).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment. ______________________________

The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-