United States v. James Vigil

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2560 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. James Vigil, also known as Joker lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs ____________ Submitted: April 29, 2025 Filed: May 2, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.

James Vigil appeals after a jury found him guilty of unlawful possession of a firearm as a prohibited person, and the district court1 sentenced him to 120 months in prison. His counsel has requested leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the verdict, and arguing that the court erred in calculating the Guidelines range. Vigil has filed a pro se brief raising similar challenges.

Upon careful review, we conclude there was sufficient evidence to support Vigil’s conviction. See United States v. Cornelison, 717 F.3d 623, 626 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); United States v. Smart, 501 F.3d 862, 865 (8th Cir. 2007); United States v. Oleson, 310 F.3d 1085, 1090 (8th Cir. 2002). We also conclude the district court did not commit reversible error with respect to calculating the applicable Guidelines range. See United States v. Peterson, 455 F.3d 834, 837 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Finally, we conclude that Vigil’s additional arguments raised in his pro se brief do not warrant vacating his conviction or sentence.

We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and affirm.

______________________________