Scott Meyer v. Gayla Rahn
Scott Meyer v. Gayla Rahn
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 25-1028 ___________________________ Scott Meyer lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Gayla Rahn, Olmsted County Court Clerk; Kim Pietrzak, Olmsted County Court Clerk; Hans Holland; Olmsted County Court; John/Jane Doe lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: May 29, 2025 Filed: June 3, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Minnesota resident Scott Meyer appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to state a claim. After careful consideration of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court properly dismissed Meyer’s claims. See Vigeant v. Meek, 953 F.3d 1022, 1024 (8th Cir. 2020) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.