Flomo Tealeh v. Acting Postmaster General Doug Tulino

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2155 ___________________________ Flomo Tealeh lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v.

United States Postal Service; Mohammad Ali; David Emerson; Scott Woltering;

John Does, 1-100 lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

Acting Postmaster General Doug Tulino; Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General1;

Andrew M. Luger, U.S. Attorney General District of Minnesota lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: June 11, 2025 Filed: June 16, 2025 [Unpublished]

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.

Flomo Tealeh appeals following the district court’s2 dismissal and subsequent adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment discrimination action against the United States Postal Service. Upon careful review, we conclude that dismissal of the complaint was proper for the reasons articulated in the district court’s orders. See Brown v. Conagra Brands, Inc., 131 F.4th 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2025) (de novo review of court’s grant of motion to dismiss); Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Tealeh’s motions to file an amended reply brief.