U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2025

United States v. Shanita Gray

United States v. Shanita Gray
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided July 31, 2025

United States v. Shanita Gray

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 25-2275 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Shanita Gray Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________ Submitted: July 18, 2025 Filed: July 31, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Shanita Gray appeals from the district court’s 1 order modifying her conditions of pretrial release. An original condition of her pretrial release was courtesy The Honorable Matthew T. Schelp, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the orders modifying conditions of release of the Honorable Rodney H. Holmes, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. supervision by the Northern District of Georgia Pretrial Services Office. After Gray violated conditions of pretrial release several times, the Northern District of Georgia terminated its courtesy supervision.

Following a bond revocation hearing, the magistrate judge ordered Gray to relocate to the Eastern District of Missouri for supervision by its Pretrial Services Office. Gray’s new conditions of pretrial release restrict travel to the Eastern District of Missouri and require participation in the Location Monitoring Program. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the new conditions of pretrial release are supported by the proceedings below. See United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992) (absent an error of law, an appellate court must affirm a district court’s order on conditions for release when it is supported by the evidence in the record).

We affirm the district court’s order modifying the conditions of pretrial release. ______________________________

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.